| Tallahassee Democrat articles debating whether hurricanes have grown more intense due to global warming, August 2005 | ||||
August 1: Kerry Emanuel of MIT shows that research says yes |
||||
|
||||
August 3: Jim O'Brien of FSU says that no research supports this view |
||||
|
||||
August 30: After Hurricane Katrina hits New Orleans, a BBCAT member points to the connection with global warming |
||||
Katrina’s wrath: The price of global warming LucyAnn Walker-Fraser, My View Who will take Katrina’s lessons to heart—if not us? As our nation confronts the horrors wrought by Hurricane Katrina and asks how we might have prevented this massive disaster, there is plenty of blame to go around - underfunding of flood control measures, inadequate disaster preparedness and slowness of response. It is fruitless to blame each other, though. Rather, we should take action to prevent a continuing succession of more and worse disasters. Even if the world had not changed, a hurricane was bound to hit New Orleans sooner or later, and yes, we left that city particularly vulnerable. But also, the world has changed and now, oceans heated by global warming are both rising and increasing the intensity of hurricanes. We Floridians, who lived through last hurricane season in Florida and watched Katrina gathering strength as she roared across the Gulf were not surprised when a new study from scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology confirmed that hurricane wind speeds have increased by about 50% over the past 50 years.
A video produced by the National Council of Churches reminds people of faith that it is the poorest countries, and the poorest among us, who will suffer the most from the effects of global warming - and Katrina drove home that lesson. Across the country, a growing number of citizens and communities agree with David Hawkins that global climate change is the preeminent moral issue of our time, and they know that it is time to stop making excuses and take action. They are acting locally to curb the burning of fossil fuels by increasing efficiency in the generation and use of electricity. They are demanding state and local investment in the development and use of renewable sources of energy. The blatant control of our national government by those with vested interests in coal and oil leave us with difficult choices. Our tax support for the fossil fuel industry is huge, compared to our support of efficiency and renewable energy. Energy efficiency is promoted in the current crisis only as a temporary response to emergencies, not as part of the long-term prevention of emergences. Yet energy efficiency can save us money, make our businesses more profitable, make us more comfortable and productive, and put the brakes on our headlong rush towards more and worse Katrinas. The federal government has self-servingly kept carbon-dioxide, the principal emission driving global warming, from being considered an air pollutant. Coal, when burned, produces roughly twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas, but the government takes the liberty of claiming that coal is “clean.” As a result, communities like Tallahassee around the country face unnecessarily difficult choices. Although the gap is narrowing, renewable energy still generally costs more than electricity produced from fossil fuels, and citizens find it an uphill battle to convince local politicians of the real benefits of increased efficiency. Other states and cities around the nation are pledging to oppose global warming, and are taking action to reduce their fossil fuel use by increasing their investments in energy efficiency and renewables. Our own local community may wonder what to do to address the global climate threat, but right now, clearly, there is one major action we can take: we can do everything in our power to oppose the building of a coal plant to supply our electricity. To commit to such a project at this time would be to make a long term, enormous financial commitment to move in the wrong direction. The better, even though more difficult, choice is to join other communities that are saying “No” to global warming. We owe it to ourselves, and especially to the poorest among us. All of us—environmentalists, politicians, citizens concerned about high energy bills and business people desirous of growth—must join together as never before. We must seriously address the needs of those who are hurt most by the burden of rising fuel prices. We must tap the expertise, creativity and good will of our citizens to find another way to supply our city with energy. We can reduce costs by improving the efficiency of the old natural gas plant; this is half the evil that coal is in terms of global warming. We invest in renewable energy resources to the extent we can. We can realize cost savings by promoting efficiency in our use of electricity in a multitude of untapped ways. We must do these things as if the life of our community depended on it. In truth, the life of our community may depend on it. |
||||